How XML Brings Old Content Back to Life
Written by John J. Xenakis for
CFO.com,
May 16, 2001.
A chipmaker is opening up its extensive library of technical documents
to its customers by using a tool for defining Web data.
Applied Micro Circuits Corp. is a prime example of how companies can
take their archives of content that's several years old and marry it
to their corporate Web strategies. The San Diego-based semiconductor
maker has been facing increasing pressure from its clients to make
its technical specifications available online. So the company decided
to oblige them.
"We decided that managing our technical documents---making them
available on the Web for customers and internal use---will lower
costs and improve service," says CFO Bill Bendush.
Pat McGinty, the firm's CIO, says, "We have pockets and islands of
technical data spread all around the company, with each group having
its own method of storage, so it's hard to make them available to
everyone."
Yet with the Web, such an inefficient situation can't be tolerated for
long.
"Because of the Web, our customers are calling us on the carpet to
make that documentation available," McGinty says. "They want more
access to the technical documents, and we'd like to be able to do
collaborative design with our customers."
AMCC has just begun a six-month effort to put up 100,000 technical
documents, some as much as 10-years old, online. The entire
implementation is expected to cost just over $1 million.
The company is using Documentum Corp.'s (http://www.documentum.com) document management software, which includes a
repository where word-processing files, engineering designs, and
other documents can be stored. The system also has tools to
manipulate content. The software can process documents produced by
more than 500 creation tools.
The software can take documents and convert and display them on AMCC's
Web site. McGinty says this feature saves him the trouble of assigning
a tech staffer with specialized HTML knowledge the task of publishing
the document.
"Once the data goes into the repository, anyone is able to set up new
Web pages and put it out onto the Web," he says.
According to McGinty, many of the 100,000 documents will simply be
stored in the repository with no special handling. The documents will
then be published on the Web as "white papers." Generally speaking,
individual sections will not be made available separately.
However, McGinty adds that many of the company's documents contain
sections of data that have to be identified separately, and for this,
AMCC is relying on the Extensible Markup Language (XML), a method of
tagging data that permits an author to specify the significance of
different items and different sections.
For example, if this column had XML tags, the sentence two paragraphs
above would read
According to McGinty , many of
the 100,000 documents will simply be
stored in the repository with no special handling.
In this example, "McGinty" is tagged as an "InterviewSubject," and
100,000 is tagged as "NumDocuments."
Longer sections of a document can also be tagged, with tags like
"ExecutiveSummary" or "DetailedProductDescription."
In the last few years, XML has been adopted as a standard in E-
commerce, where XML tags identifying fields of data such as credit
card numbers or invoice detail items are becoming increasingly
common.
"XML is the major driver in the whole ability to describe content,"
says Alan Weintraub, analyst with Stamford, Conn., based Gartner
Group. "Companies just using Word to write simple one-page memos
probably don't need XML. Companies that want to produce reusable
manuals should consider XML. And companies producing technical
documentation can't ignore it."
But for a firm like AMCC, where many of its documents were written and
stored in files years ago, it's no easy task to add XML tags to these
legacy documents.
XML tags can be added with an ordinary word processor, but that's
incredibly labor-intensive. To save companies the trouble, some
special tools have been designed in recent years, including Xmetal
from SoftQuad Software Ltd. (http://www.softquad.com) and Epic
from Arbortext Inc. (http://www.arbortext.com), both of which are
integrated with Documentum's 4i.
Even so, adding XML tags can be time consuming, according to Whitney
Tidmarsh, VP of marketing for Documentum. Based on her experience, "an
average worker can do XML tagging for 50 pages a week, tops."
But once XML tags have been added to the documents, it becomes easier
to re-use them and export them to other systems. For example, a sales
or marketing employee can take sections of a file that's been encoded
in XML and reformat it more easily than if it lacks the tags.
Documentum charges $100,000 to license a typical entry-level version
of 4i. But, according to the company, the average license will run
approximately $300,000, and it's not unusual for a high-end
installation to exceed $1 million. Features include the repository and
server, version control of documents, workflow functions to manage
document approval
"What's interesting about Documentum is that they stand just about
alone at the high end of the marketplace," says Charles Brett, an
analyst with the Stamford, Conn., based Meta Group. "They're the big
daddy in terms of document management systems, and they're also good
at managing web content." Managing web content is a niche function of
this category, managing documents which, unlike word processing
documents, are intended for display only on the web.
According to Brett, users considering Documentum should also check
out FileNet Corp. (http://www.filenet.com), Hummingbird Ltd.
(http://www.hummingbird.com), and Open Text Corp. (http://www.opentext.com). For managing web content, users should look at
Interwoven Inc. (http://www.interwoven.com) and Open Market Inc.
(http://www.openmarket.com).
Lower cost solutions, in the $20,000 license fee range, include Lotus
Development Corp.'s Domino.com (http://www.lotus.com) and Xerox
Corp.'s DocuShare (http://www.xerox.com).
"These are two solutions that we see on the lower end," says Brett.
"They don't have tons of features, but they can get the job done."
(This is a modified version of an article that originally
appeared on
May 16, 2001
on
CFO.com
at
this location.
)
|